The first
time we argued about the term ‘digital transformation’ was three, maybe four
years ago.
We were
positioning a business and at the point where we were trying to describe the
change in the world. The big secular shift that demanded action.
Someone
pitched ‘digital transformation’ as a term that kind of fit the bill.
Someone else said
it didn’t actually mean anything and using it would signal our client was selling
snake oil.
Another someone
else argued that people were already using the term and it signals something
big. Something fundamental. The kind of thing the CEO pays attention to.
We went at it
for a bit and in the end included it in an option. The client loved it.
So we had the
same argument with them, warned them it might fall flat and eventually decided
to take it to market. It was hard to tell if using the term was the right move
back then.
To be honest,
it still is.
Where do buzzwords come from?
In the years
since, we’ve seen and used that term in all sorts of markets for all sorts of
reasons – good and bad – and it’s generally become a non-controversial idea to
base your story around.
“We sell six
completely disparate things that barely integrate but we need to make it all sound
like one big thing.”
“Digital
transformation”.
“We sell a
kind of automation that doesn’t really matter but we need people to think it
does.”
“Digital
transformation.”
“We have 17
days, 13 hours and 14 minutes to re-position the business.”
“Digital
transformation.”
“We have four
strong opinions in the executive team and a completely unempowered person
refereeing the meeting.”
“Digital
transformation.”
This is how bullshit spreads.
A hundred
different marketers pick a term off the shelf for a hundred different reasons
in a hundred different markets.
Next thing
you know, we have a meme. A buzzword.
“A reliable way to make people believe in falsehoods is frequent repetition, because familiarity is not easily distinguished from truth.”
— Kahneman. Applies to so much.
— Morgan Housel (@morganhousel) May 22, 2019
But while I
used to roll my eyes at buzzwords, I’ve come to appreciate that the most
important thing about them isn’t how marketers use them – it’s how people
with actual skin in the game use them.
See, it’s the
people putting their necks on the line, leading something like a ‘digital
transformation’ initiative who really need the buzzword.
It’s the CIO
who needs everyone to just back off and let her make the decisions that need to
be made. Sure she could get into the details of migration and architecture and
re-tooling. Or she could say ‘cloud-first’.
It’s the head
of digital engineering who knows the business couldn’t possibly compete with
startups the way they work now. She could say we’re taking a big risk by
changing all our processes. Or she could say ‘devops’.
It’s the CMO who’s realized it will take nothing short of a complete overhaul to make customers want to engage with the business. She could say we’re going to use tools we’ve never used, frameworks we’ve never tested and workflows we’ve never experienced. Or she could say ‘CX transformation’.
Yes, vendors
jump in on the buzzword bingo and take advantage. Of course, you do.
But let’s be
perfectly honest about cause and effect here. CIOs, CEOs and CMOs don’t use
these terms because marketers made them up.
We use them
because they need them.
So what is the point of using a buzzword?
The real
function of a buzzword is to make big change more palatable.
There’s a
whole lot of money, time and risk involved in initiatives as big as ‘digital
transformations’ – loads of them fail – and someone’s got to be accountable.
So if you’re
in a big, old, public, unwieldy enterprise that’s misaligned internally and
terrified of regulations, you’re going to want to make your plan sound like the
safest, surest bet since sliced bread.
You’re going
to want to call it something familiar. Something they’ve heard said.
Something they can say without looking
stupid/risky/crazy/unreliable/unpredictable.
The term
‘digital transformation’ has currency because leaders and executives need to
communicate that what they’re doing is socially acceptable and likely to
succeed.
It’s of a
zeitgeist.
It’s a safety
blanket around an agenda that is necessarily complex, technical and risky.
So if you’re
using a buzzword to mask your own business’ failure to make strong decisions or
to pretend you’re something you really aren’t, I wish you luck. You’re going to
need it.
But if you’re
using a buzzword to give your buyers the ammunition they need to get internal
buy-in for actual sensible change, they’ll actually appreciate it.
–
Enjoyed this article?
Take part in the discussion
Comments
There are no comments yet for this post. Why not be the first?