It’s from an SEOmoz survey and simply asks people how they choose what they read. The slide says it all:
It still amazes me how many companies get so much right – a great product, compelling logic, an air-tight ROI case – then fall down at the final, most critical hurdle: putting the story into words that attract and convince. Fuzzy, jargon-packed copy alienates buyers. Clear, compelling copy attracts them.
Thanks for sharing this Joe and Jeff.
(BTW – Jeff’s white paper, “Moving from Transactional to Conversational Email” is also worth a read).
Enjoyed this article?
Take part in the discussion
Related blog/content

Killed by the buzz: Why we’re losing words to the buzz effect (and what to do about it)
Here’s a question for you: What do buzzwords and That One Guy You Hate™ have in common? You guessed it. They both sneak into every conversation…
Nur Caplin | 20. 09. 2023

How to break free from the benchmark trap
If you’re turning to industry benchmarks to set your performance goals – make sure you’re asking these two questions.
Agustin Rejon | 06. 09. 2023

The B2B generative AI design shootout: Part 2
We put different models of generative AI to a heftier task in Part 2 of our three-part design test shootout.
Brian Terry | 29. 08. 2023
-
I like this a lot – I often find myself falling into the trap of writing for speed rather than quality. It’s a handy reminder to anyone who has to write copy as part of their role (I’m sure professional copywriters need no reminder!).
-
Thanks for posting this Doug. I was just discussing that very topic this morning over coffee. Those who think posting low-value, high-volume content will ‘win’ them customers via SEO are missing the point – it’s the people in the SEO equation that evaluate the content for credibility and quality. The result of that evaluation makes them buyers or ‘bounces’. This slide does say it all – thanks for sharing.
-
Thanks Steves — it’s easy to forget that everything we do as B2B marketers eventually has to end up as words!
-
I am glad to see someone saying what is obvious to anyone who writes. Quality matters when it comes to thought leadership marketing. And so does insight, and originality. Good, thoughtful relevant content rises to the top. Sadly, most marketers cannot tell the difference. So they publish bloated white papers, lightly veiled brochures, rehashed third party content or wafer thin articles.
One problem is that copywriting is not the discipline in question here. Thought leadership selling is not copywriting. Copywriters are trained to write ads – usually with fewer than fifty words – not deliver thought leadership or insight. So traditional ad agencies are ill equipped to provide it. Finding someone who can write and think and has a sense of the sales cycle is very hard.
Steve Fair